(N.B. This is the study blog for the
course Theory and Method for Media Technology. More detailed information
regarding the theme as well as the course is available on the course page [1].)
As a study review blog, I will reflect on
the efforts I made for the second theme. Frist and foremost, a lot of reading
has been done for a better understanding of this theme, such as the book Dialectic
of Enlightenment [2] by
Adorno and Horkheimer and Walter Benjamin’s
influential essay "The Work of Art in the Age of Technical
Reproductivity" [3]. In
addition to these, I want to discuss more about our blogs. It is so great to
read other’s blogs. Your guys’ interesting and inspiring views make me much
better understand the philosophic texts, especially for the great examples you
made.
During this week’s study, I found several
concepts have been misunderstood before, but I am very glad that they have now
been clarified clearly after lecture and seminar.
Firstly, to get a better understanding of
Nominalism, we discussed it compared with Realism. One of my classmate said
that ‘Nominalism is more specific, while realism is more general.’ This is
interesting to me and help enhance my understanding of Nominalism. As
Nominalism is often used with not changing, it can be seen as a metaphysical
view in philosophy, in which abstract ideas or concepts do not exist.
What other important and useful thing we
learned from the lecture is to investigate something within its born context
though the cultural and historical lens. In this sense, a more completed picture
and a more reasonable sense can be achieved.
There is also a pair of key concepts for this
theme, which are ‘substructure’ and ‘superstructure’. Besides my previous
knowledge of the concepts, one classmates proposed another interesting
explanation to them as ‘The substructure was everything related to
the production, such as machines; while the superstructure was the art, for example entertainment. It is a
good way to make examples to discuss the abstract philosophical terms with
relation to our studied subject media technology.
Last but not the least, my understanding
of ‘enlightenment’ is well improved. And another important term I learned this
week is the ‘AURO’, which is a kernel view according to Benjamin and can be
referred to ‘uniqueness’ or ‘authenticity’. What’s more, I also find the
Allegory of the Cave from Plato [4] is very interesting and helpful to
understand this week’s theme. Learned from his example, it can be concluded
that not only the philosopher but also the scholar or just each of us who
wishes to seek wisdom should try to be freed from the cave and come to
understand the shadow as well as the reality.
Sources:
[1] https://www.kth.se/social/course/DM2572/page/theme-2-critical-media-studies-2/
[2] Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment (Vol. 15). Verso.
[3] Walter Benjamin (1968). Hannah Arendt, ed. "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction", Illuminations. London: Fontana. pp. 214–218.ISBN 9781407085500.
[1] https://www.kth.se/social/course/DM2572/page/theme-2-critical-media-studies-2/
[2] Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment (Vol. 15). Verso.
[3] Walter Benjamin (1968). Hannah Arendt, ed. "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction", Illuminations. London: Fontana. pp. 214–218.ISBN 9781407085500.
[4] Plato. (1945). The republic of
Plato (Vol. 30, pp. 175-203). New York: Oxford
University Press.
Thanks for sharing us with your thoughts! It is very nice looking through your high-quality comments and reflections about the lecture and the seminar. I totally agree with your opinions. I hope it could be possible that we have more discussion in the following seminars. Good job!
ReplyDelete